| Of the 146 members
in the WTO, four are from China, namely the Chinese mainland, Hong Kong
SAR, Macao SAR and Taiwan Island. The unique and unprecedented situation
in which one country holds four seats in one organization is an evolved
from the complicated factors in history.
Years ago, there was a call among scholars for a "Greater Chinese
Economic Ring" but it died down for some time now. The voice is yet
once again heard in recent years. Nevertheless, the author prefers the
term of "Greater China Economic Ring". The cornerstone of the
ring lies in the cross-strait economic integration and development. Failing
that, the "Greater China Economic Ring" would never be there.
However, recent years have witnessed many twists and turns along the way
of the political relation across the Taiwan Straits and sometimes even
at daggers drawn. What's more, Taiwan is up to now still under the rule
of the pro-independence Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
In spite of all this, things seem to bode well for the economic and
trade integration of the "Greater China Economic Ring" two years
after China's entry into the WTO.
First of all, with the elapse of two years, hostility between China's
mainland and Taiwan over the issue of the WTO accession is fading away.
Before the WTO admission, China's mainland had once been concerned about
any possible disturbance from Taiwan, which would intercept the membership
of China's mainland by applying for an exclusive clause to ward off its
accession on the pretext of security issue. And Taiwan, on the other hand,
was worrying that the Chinese mainland would seize upon the opportunity
to outflank it. The fear has by-and-by evaporated into the thin air as
the two sides entered into the WTO one after another and basically lived
in peace with each other over the past two years. The two sides even went
so far as to have bilateral communications and consultations between their
WTO representatives in the WTO framework and the atmosphere was described
as "friendly and constructive".
Secondly, the Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (CEPA) signed
between the Chinese inland, Hong Kong and Macao respectively is of positive
significance to Taiwan's economic development. Given the close HK-Taiwan
and Macao-Taiwan trade relationship and their frequent personnel flows,
the further economic and trade exchanges between the inland and Hong Kong
and Macao will unassailably exert a positive impact on Taiwan's economy.
Thirdly, the westward movement into the Chinese mainland by Taiwan businessmen
has for decades been gaining its momentum. The cross-strait economic and
trade exchanges have basically remained unruffled by the political uncertainties.
Statistics shows that the cross-strait trade has been moving upward on
16 successive years since 1987. The bilateral trade volume came to USD
267.929b from 1978 to 2002. Taiwan's exports to the mainland enjoyed a
ceaseless increase of 24 years on end from 1979. A case underpinning the
point was a record-high rise of 195.29 percent for Taiwan's exports in
1999 to China's mainland as compared with that of the previous year. However,
right in the very year an extreme tension overshadowed the Taiwan Straits,
which was the "two nations" theory stirred up by Lee Tung Hui.
Fourthly, more and more multinationals are taking the "Greater
China Economic Ring" as a whole when they are mapping out their industrial
chains. This is good for the forming of the Ring. Some giant corporations
include a "Greater Chinese Region" in their organizational structure,
while the headquarters of this "Greater Chinese Region" are
differently based with some in Hong Kong, others in Shanghai or Beijing.
According to the author's observation, it is a common practice among many
multinationals to set up their R&D centers in Taiwan, while taking
the advantage of Hong Kong?¯s financial service and setting up manufacturing
facilities in the Chinese mainland. Before long, Ford, a prestigious US
carmaker, launched a program involving both Taiwan and China's mainland.
Under this program, Taiwan will house its design center and car parts
supply base while its newly developed autos will be jointly produced by
Taiwan and the Chinese mainland.
It is the positive catalyst mentioned above that has forced Taiwan authorities
to make concessions thereby foreboding the influx of economic and trade
exchanges despite of the political stagnation between the two sides.
On Oct.9, the so-called "Legislative Yuan" of Taiwan passed
an amendment draft of "Regulations on the Relations between the People
of Taiwan and the Mainland of China" which relaxed restrictions on
the economic and trade exchanges across the straits. This amended version
stipulates that ships, aircrafts, and other transportation vehicles of
Taiwan are allowed to travel to China's mainland on condition that they
receive permits from the governing institutions. Relevant approving and
management procedures are required to be submitted within 18 months. Any
delay is subject to the nod of the "Legislative Yuan". The "Ministry
of Transportation and Communication" of Taiwan has expressed their
readiness of complying with the rule and working out the approval procedure
for Taiwan's ships and aircraft to travel to the Chinese mainland in 18
months time. It is learned that this is the first time for certain agencies
in Taiwan authorities to present a specific schedule as such on the issue
of direct shipping links across the straits.
There is still a cleft between the revised regulations and the "three
direct links" that the Chinese mainland is seeking for. Despite that,
it will boost the cross-strait economic and trade relations to some extent.
In the meantime, voices calling for the "three direct links"
are again heard from among the industrial and trade circles in Taiwan
Island.
Pro-independent politicians in Taiwan are pursuing for the "de-China"
policy. They refuse the "one China" principle, defer the process
of the "three direct links" and economically slip toward the
US and Japan by aggressively peddling its "Taiwan-Japan?±
and "Taiwan-US" free trade. In despite of all this, the booming
of the economic and trade exchanges across the straits is an inexorable
trend.
So long as this trend keeps its momentum, the dream for a Greater China
Economic Ring is close by hand instead of something beyond reach. |